Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31091781›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Human Attitude toward Reptiles: A Relationship between Fear, Disgust, and Aesthetic Preferences.

Markéta Janovcová, Silvie Rádlová, Jakub Polák, Kristýna Sedláčková, Šárka Peléšková, Barbora Žampachová, Daniel Frynta, Eva Landová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Why Are Some Snakes More Terrifying and What Is Behind the Fear?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. WASP: the World Archives of Species Perception.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markéta JanovcováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Silvie RádlováNational Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67 Klecany, Czech Republic.
Jakub PolákDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Kristýna SedláčkováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Šárka PeléškováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Barbora ŽampachováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Daniel FryntaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.
Eva LandováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-15991SGrantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 1636218Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 346315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focusing on one group of animals can bring interesting results regarding our attitudes toward them and show the key features that our evaluation of such animals is based on. Thus, we designed a study of human perception of all reptiles focusing on the relationship between perceived fear, disgust, and aesthetic preferences and differences between snakes and other reptiles. Two sets containing 127 standardized photos of reptiles were developed, with one species per each subfamily. Respondents were asked to rate the animals according to fear, disgust, and beauty on a seven-point Likert scale. Evaluation of reptile species shows that people tend to perceive them as two clearly distinct groups based on their similar morphotype. In a subset of lizards, there was a positive correlation between fear and disgust, while disgust and fear were both negatively correlated with beauty. Surprisingly, a positive correlation between fear and beauty of snakes was revealed, i.e., the most feared species also tend to be perceived as beautiful. Snakes represent a distinct group of animals that is also reflected in the theory of attentional prioritization of snakes as an evolutionary relevant threat.

Indexed as

beautydisgustemotionsfearreptiles

Identifiers

PMID31091781
PMCPMC6562393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.