ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
A Review: Photonic Devices Used for Dosimetry in Medical Radiation.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of a 100 nm RADFET as a Proton Beam Detector.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and Characterization of Silver Containing Free Standing Polymer FILMS for Dosimetry Applications.Polymers · 2021Article
- Funneling Spontaneous Emission into Waveguides via Epsilon-Near-Zero Metamaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Simulated Characterization and Suitability of Semiconductor Detectors for Strontium 90 Assay in Groundwater.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Smart Sensors for Healthcare and Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Development of Novel Real-Time Radiation Systems Using 4-Channel Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Use of High-Field Electron Injection into Dielectrics to Enhance Functional Capabilities of Radiation MOS Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous instruments such as ionization chambers, hand-held and pocket dosimeters of various types, film badges, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) are used to measure and monitor radiation in medical applications. Of recent, photonic devices have also been adopted. This article evaluates recent research and advancements in the applications of photonic devices in medical radiation detection primarily focusing on four types; photodiodes - including light-emitting diodes (LEDs), phototransistors-including metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs), photovoltaic sensors/solar cells, and charge coupled devices/charge metal oxide semiconductors (CCD/CMOS) cameras. A comprehensive analysis of the operating principles and recent technologies of these devices is performed. Further, critical evaluation and comparison of their benefits and limitations as dosimeters is done based on the available studies. Common factors barring photonic devices from being used as radiation detectors are also discussed; with suggestions on possible solutions to overcome these barriers. Finally, the potentials of these devices and the challenges of realizing their applications as quintessential dosimeters are highlighted for future research and improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.