ArticleBiomolecules2019
Profiling the Bacterial Diversity in a Typical Karst Tiankeng of China.
Article in Biomolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cave microbial communities are structured by environmental matrix and depth and can be characterized with field-portable assays.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Carbon fixation performance and the stability surroundings of Serratia sp. isolated from karst.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metagenomic insights into soil microbial diversity and antibiotic resistance genes in pristine karst tiankeng ecosystems.mSphere · 2025Article
- The life strategy of bacteria rather than fungi shifts in karst tiankeng island-like systems.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Two newMycoKeys · 2024Article
- Comparison of soil microbial community structure and function for karst tiankeng with different degrees of degradation.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Species Diversity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Slope aspect affects the soil microbial communities in karst tiankeng negative landforms.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Metagenomic analysis reveals the different characteristics of microbial communities inside and outside the karst tiankeng.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- The characterization of microbial communities and associations in karst tiankeng.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- The Biomolecular Spectrum Drives Microbial Biology and Functions in Agri-Food-Environments.Biomolecules · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While karst tiankengs have a higher capacity to act as safe havens for biodiversity in changing climates, little is known about their soil microorganisms. To fill this gap, we investigate the distribution and driving factors of the bacterial community in karst tiankeng systems. There is a significant difference in the soil characteristics between the inside and the outside of a karst tiankeng. At the karst tiankeng considered in this study, the bacterial composition, in terms of the operational taxonomic unit (OTU), was found to be significantly different in different soil samples, taken from diverse sampling sites within the collapsed doline or the external area, and showed a high habitat heterogeneity. The dominant phylum abundances vary with the sampling sites and have their own indicator taxa from phylum to genus. Unlike the primary controlling factors of plant diversity, the microclimate (soil moisture and temperature), soil pH, and slope dominated the distribution of the bacterial community in karst tiankeng systems. Our results firstly showed the distribution characteristics of bacterial communities and then revealed the importance of microhabitats in predicting the microbial distribution in karst tiankeng systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.