Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31091666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Repeats in S1 Proteins: Flexibility and Tendency for Intrinsic Disorder.

Andrey Machulin, Evgenia Deryusheva, Mikhail Lobanov, Oxana Galzitskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Macromolecular Interactions of Disordered Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrey MachulinSkryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center "Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia. and.machul@gmail.com.
Evgenia DeryushevaInstitute for Biological Instrumentation, Federal Research Center "Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia. evgenia.deryusheva@gmail.com.
Mikhail LobanovInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia. mlobanov@phys.protres.ru.
Oxana GalzitskayaInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia. ogalzit@vega.protres.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-3962-1520
Institute of Protein Research · RUG. K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms · RUInstitute for Biological Instrumentation · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 18-14-00321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important feature of ribosomal S1 proteins is multiple copies of structural domains in bacteria, the number of which changes in a strictly limited range from one to six. For S1 proteins, little is known about the contribution of flexible regions to protein domain function. We exhaustively studied a tendency for intrinsic disorder and flexibility within and between structural domains for all available UniProt S1 sequences. Using charge-hydrophobicity plot cumulative distribution function (CH-CDF) analysis we classified 53% of S1 proteins as ordered proteins; the remaining proteins were related to molten globule state. S1 proteins are characterized by an equal ratio of regions connecting the secondary structure within and between structural domains, which indicates a similar organization of separate S1 domains and multi-domain S1 proteins. According to the FoldUnfold and IsUnstruct programs, in the multi-domain proteins, relatively short flexible or disordered regions are predominant. The lowest percentage of flexibility is in the central parts of multi-domain proteins. Our results suggest that the ratio of flexibility in the separate domains is related to their roles in the activity and functionality of S1: a more stable and compact central part in the multi-domain proteins is vital for RNA interaction, terminals domains are important for other functions.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein DomainsRibosomal ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsRibosomal Proteinsribosomal protein S1FoldUnfold programintrinsically flexibilityIsUnstruct programribosomal proteins S1structural domains

Identifiers

PMID31091666
PMCPMC6566611
OpenAlexW2944824633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.