Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31091435›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2019

FGF Modulates the Axial Identity of Trunk hPSC-Derived Neural Crest but Not the Cranial-Trunk Decision.

James O S Hackland, Patrick B Shelar, Nabjot Sandhu, Maneeshi S Prasad, Rebekah M Charney, Gustavo A Gomez, Thomas J R Frith, Martín I García-Castro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James O S HacklandUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Electronic address: hacklandj@gmail.com.
Patrick B ShelarUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Nabjot SandhuUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Maneeshi S PrasadUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Rebekah M CharneyUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Gustavo A GomezUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Thomas J R FrithUniversity of Sheffield, Department of Biomedical Science, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Martín I García-CastroUniversity of California Riverside, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Electronic address: martin.garcia-castro@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Molecular Interactions During Neural Crest FormationR01DE017914 · NIDCR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GARCIA-CASTRO, MARTIN I. · 2007 to 2025
$6.3M
Identification of a novel regulatory program underlying the early specification of Neural Crest cellsF32DE027862 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI CHARNEY, REBEKAH · 2018 to 2020
$133k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE027862NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural crest is a transient embryonic tissue that gives rise to a multitude of derivatives in an axially restricted manner. An in vitro counterpart to neural crest can be derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and can be used to study neural crest ontogeny and neurocristopathies, and to generate cells for therapeutic purposes. In order to successfully do this, it is critical to define the specific conditions required to generate neural crest of different axial identities, as regional restriction in differentiation potential is partly cell intrinsic. WNT and FGF signaling have been implicated as inducers of posterior fate, but the exact role that these signals play in trunk neural crest formation remains unclear. Here, we present a fully defined, xeno-free system for generating trunk neural crest from hPSCs and show that FGF signaling directs cells toward different axial identities within the trunk compartment while WNT signaling is the primary determinant of trunk versus cranial identity.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFibroblast Growth FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeural CrestNeurogenesisPluripotent Stem CellsSignal TransductionSkullFibroblast Growth Factorsaxial progenitorsBrachyuryCDX2FGFhuman pluripotent stemm cellsNMPsOTX2SOX2trunk neural crestWNT

Identifiers

PMID31091435
PMCPMC6524753
OpenAlexW2945853220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.