ArticleVision research2019
Adaptation and visual discomfort from flicker.
Article in Vision research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cerebral Basis for Visual Discomfort and Visual Stress.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Designing for sensory adaptation: what you see depends on what you've been looking at - Recommendations, guidelines and standards should reflect this.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024Article
- Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022Article
- Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.Vision research · 2020Article
- Visual Perception of Moisture Is a Pathogen Detection Mechanism of the Behavioral Immune System.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial images with unnatural amplitude spectra tend to appear uncomfortable. Analogous effects are found in the temporal domain, yet discomfort in flickering patterns is also strongly dependent on the phase spectrum. Here we examined how discomfort in temporal flicker is affected by adaptation to different amplitude and phase spectra. Adapting and test flicker were square wave or random phase transitions in a uniform field filtered by increasing (blurred) or decreasing (sharpened) the slope of the amplitude spectrum. Participants rated the level of discomfort or sharpness/blur for the test flicker. Before adaptation, square wave transitions were rated as most comfortable when they had "focused" edges, which were defined as characterized by 1/f amplitude spectra, while random phase transitions instead appeared more comfortable the more blurred they were. After adapting to blurred or sharpened transitions, both square wave and random phase flicker appeared more sharpened or blurred, respectively, and these effects were consistent with renormalization of perceived temporal focus. In comparison, adaptation affected discomfort in the two waveforms in qualitatively different ways, and exposure to the adapting stimulus tended to increase rather than decreased its perceived discomfort. These results point to a dissociation between the perceived amplitude spectrum and perceived discomfort, suggesting they in part depend on distinct processes. The results further illustrate the importance of the phase spectrum in determining visual discomfort from flickering patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.