Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31090360›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2019

[Progress of mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes in wound repair].

Jiangwen Wang, Yangyan Yi, Yuanzheng Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Research on the method of loading exosomes onto absorbable stents].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiangwen WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, 330006, P.R.China.
Yangyan YiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, 330006, P.R.China.yyy0218@126.com.
Yuanzheng ZhuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi, 330006, P.R.China.
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the research progress of mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes (MSCs-EXOs) in wound repair in recent years.

methodsThe literature about the role of MSCs-EXOs in wound repair at home and abroad was extensively consulted. The mechanism of MSCs-EXOs in wound repair and its clinical application prospects were summarized and analyzed.

resultsMSCs-EXOs can inhibit early inflammatory reaction, promote angiogenesis, proliferation, and migration of epithelial cells, regulate collagen synthesis, and inhibit scar proliferation in the later stage of wound healing. Compared with MSCs, MSCs-EXOs have many advantages, such as high stability, easy storage, non-tumorigenicity, no proliferation, easy quantitative use, and so on. It has broad clinical application prospects.

conclusionMSCs-EXOs can promote wound repair and hopefully develop into a clinical product to promote the repair of acute or chronic wounds.

Indexed as

ExosomesMesenchymal Stem CellsCicatrixHumansangiogenesisexosomesinflammationMesenchymal stem cellswound repair

Identifiers

PMID31090360
PMCPMC8337197
OpenAlexW2946784710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.