Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31090202›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2019

Allergen-specific IgE to recombinant latex allergens in occupational allergy diagnostics.

Ewa Nowakowska-Świrta, Marta Wiszniewska, Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Latex allergy and medical aspects of the use of latex products.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. VALIDA project: Validation of allergyAdvances in laboratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Latex allergy guidelines for people with spina bifida.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ewa Nowakowska-ŚwirtaDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Environmental Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-8216
Marta WiszniewskaDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Environmental Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-7493
Jolanta Walusiak-SkorupaDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Environmental Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-6800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSpecific challenge tests (SICs) are considered reference tests for allergic occupational diseases diagnosis. However, in numerous cases, SICs cannot be carried out in the diagnosis of allergy to latex due to the risk of generalized reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of sIgE determination to recombinant latex allergens in diagnostics of occupational respiratory allergy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study group comprised 44 healthcare workers (HCW) suspected of suffering from occupational respiratory allergy to latex (they underwent a physical examination, skin-prick tests (SPTs) to common and latex allergens, spirometry and SIC) and 17 controls not occupationally exposed to latex, with a positive sIgE against latex. Each serum was tested for allergen-specific IgE to aeroallergens, latex, eight recombinant latex allergens and CCD-markers.

resultsSpecific IgE against Hev b5, 6.01, and 6.02 were significantly more frequently detected in HCWs and their mean serum levels were higher compared with the control group. In 26 HCWs with occupational asthma (OA), sensitization to Hev b5, Hev b6.01, Hev b6.02 was significantly more frequent than in 18 HCWs with work-exacerbated asthma (WEA); they had positive results SPT to latex significantly more frequently in comparison with subjects with WEA.

conclusionsTest for recombinant latex allergens is much more accurate in recognition of latex allergy than test for latex extract, which seems to produce false-positive results in patients with pollen allergy. The measurements of sIgE against recombinant latex allergens Hev b 6.01, 6.02, 5, and 8 are useful in differentiating OA from WEA.

Indexed as

AdultAllergensFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin ELatex HypersensitivityMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRecombinant ProteinsSkin TestsYoung AdultAllergensImmunoglobulin ERecombinant Proteinsairway allergydiagnostic methodshealthcare workerslatex allergyoccupational allergyrecombinant latex allergens

Identifiers

PMID31090202
PMCPMC6718933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.