Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31090160›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2019

Ecological momentary assessments among patients with cancer: A scoping review.

Caroline S Kampshoff, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw, Martijn G van Oijen, Mirjam A Sprangers, Laurien M Buffart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05956782 (A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention for Reducing Lung Cancer Symptoms - a Pilot Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05956782 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention for Reducing Lung Cancer Symptoms - a Pilot Randomized Control Trial (Breathe Easier II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South CarolinaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsLung Cancer, Nonsmall Cell, COPD, Self-Management, Physical InactivityArmsBreathe Easier
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying person-level factors to guide digital mental health treatments for cancer survivors: an ecological momentary assessment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A novel ecological momentary assessment app for the investigation of daily cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline S KampshoffDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-1409
Irma M Verdonck-de LeeuwDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-4607
Martijn G van OijenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4581-1440
Mirjam A SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health (APH) Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC (location Academic Medical Center), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-6933
Laurien M BuffartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8095-436X

Funding

Cancer Center Amsterdam
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEcological momentary assessment (EMA) is an emerging method to assess an individual's current thoughts, affect, behaviour, physical states and contextual factors as they occur in real-time and in their natural environment. Whereas EMA is frequently used in mental health, little is known about the added value of EMA in oncology research. This review aimed to synthesise methodological information and results of studies that applied EMA among patients with cancer to inform future researchers about the opportunities and challenges.

methodsWe included full-text articles on studies that: (a) were conducted among adult cancer patients; and (b) examined cancer and treatment-related experiences by EMA. Information from selected studies was synthesised: study designs, EMA data collection methods, response-related results and main findings.

resultsTwelve studies were included, which all applied an observational design. The EMA data collection methods varied considerably and the reporting of response-related results were poor. Nevertheless, EMA was found feasible as no systematic patterns of problems were reported and reported response-related results were acceptable. Furthermore, EMA was found useful as it facilitated examination of real-time experiences and behaviour.

conclusionEcological momentary assessment is useful and feasible in oncology research. Future studies would benefit from guidelines for designing and reporting EMA studies.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentAffectCircadian RhythmFatigueFeasibility StudiesHumansNeoplasmsResearch Designecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingneoplasmsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID31090160
PMCPMC9285429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.