Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31090126›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.

Wataru Sato, Takanori Kochiyama, Shota Uono, Reiko Sawada, Yasutaka Kubota, Sayaka Yoshimura, Motomi Toichi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Face-Selective Patches in Marmosets Are Involved in Dynamic and Static Facial Expression Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Editorial: Dynamic Emotional Communication.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wataru SatoKokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5335-1272
Takanori KochiyamaBrain Activity Imaging Center, ATR-Promotions, Inc., Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-0674
Shota UonoDepartment of Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry, Habilitation and Rehabilitation, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-0522
Reiko SawadaDepartment of Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry, Habilitation and Rehabilitation, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasutaka KubotaHealth and Medical Services Center, Shiga University, Hikone, Shiga, Japan.
Sayaka YoshimuraDepartment of Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry, Habilitation and Rehabilitation, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-8575
Motomi ToichiFaculty of Human Health Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPShiga University · JP

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency CREST (JPMJCR17A5)Japan Science and Technology Agency Research Complex ProgramJapan Society for the Promotion of Science LZ008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic facial expressions of emotions constitute natural and powerful means of social communication in daily life. A number of previous neuroimaging studies have explored the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of dynamic facial expressions, and indicated the activation of certain social brain regions (e.g., the amygdala) during such tasks. However, the activated brain regions were inconsistent across studies, and their laterality was rarely evaluated. To investigate these issues, we measured brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging in a relatively large sample (n = 51) during the observation of dynamic facial expressions of anger and happiness and their corresponding dynamic mosaic images. The observation of dynamic facial expressions, compared with dynamic mosaics, elicited stronger activity in the bilateral posterior cortices, including the inferior occipital gyri, fusiform gyri, and superior temporal sulci. The dynamic facial expressions also activated bilateral limbic regions, including the amygdalae and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, more strongly versus mosaics. In the same manner, activation was found in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and left cerebellum. Laterality analyses comparing original and flipped images revealed right hemispheric dominance in the superior temporal sulcus and IFG and left hemispheric dominance in the cerebellum. These results indicated that the neural mechanisms underlying processing of dynamic facial expressions include widespread social brain regions associated with perceptual, emotional, and motor functions, and include a clearly lateralized (right cortical and left cerebellar) network like that involved in language processing.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionLanguageSocial PerceptionAdultAmygdalaBrain MappingCerebellumEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPrefrontal Cortexamygdaladynamic facial expressionfunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)inferior frontal gyruslateralitysuperior temporal sulcus

Identifiers

PMID31090126
PMCPMC6865540
OpenAlexW2944939511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.