Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089984›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2019

Exploiting the natural poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) production capacity of Antarctic Pseudomonas strains: from unique phenotypes to novel biopolymers.

Nicolas Pacheco, Matias Orellana-Saez, Marzena Pepczynska, Javier Enrione, Monica Bassas-Galia, Jose M Borrero-de Acuña, Flavia C Zacconi, Andrés E Marcoleta, Ignacio Poblete-Castro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative genomics of the extremophileFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fed-BatchFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  8. Engineering the Osmotic State ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas PachecoBiosystems Engineering Laboratory, Center for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology (CBIB), Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Republica 330, Santiago, Chile.
Matias Orellana-SaezBiosystems Engineering Laboratory, Center for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology (CBIB), Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Republica 330, Santiago, Chile.
Marzena PepczynskaBiopolymer Research and Engineering Lab (BiopREL), Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Javier EnrioneBiopolymer Research and Engineering Lab (BiopREL), Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Monica Bassas-GaliaInstitute of Life Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO Valais), Route du Rawyl 47, 1950, Sion, Switzerland.
Jose M Borrero-de AcuñaInstitute of Microbiology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany.
Flavia C ZacconiFacultad de Química y de Farmacia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Andrés E MarcoletaDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ignacio Poblete-CastroBiosystems Engineering Laboratory, Center for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology (CBIB), Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Republica 330, Santiago, Chile. ignacio.poblete@unab.cl.
Universidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CLHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLTechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 11150174insituto antarctico chileno RT_51-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme environments are a unique source of microorganisms encoding metabolic capacities that remain largely unexplored. In this work, we isolated two Antarctic bacterial strains able to produce poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) (PHAs), which were classified after 16S rRNA analysis as Pseudomonas sp. MPC5 and MPC6. The MPC6 strain presented nearly the same specific growth rate whether subjected to a temperature of 4 °C 0.18 (1/h) or 30 °C 0.2 (1/h) on glycerol. Both Pseudomonas strains produced high levels of PHAs and exopolysaccharides from glycerol at 4 °C and 30 °C in batch cultures, an attribute that has not been previously described for bacteria of this genus. The MPC5 strain produced the distinctive medium-chain-length-PHA whereas Pseudomonas sp. MPC6 synthesized a novel polyoxoester composed of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-3-hydroxydecanoate-co-3-hydroxydodecanoate). Batch bioreactor production of PHAs in MPC6 resulted in a titer of 2.6 (g/L) and 1.3 (g/L), accumulating 47.3% and 34.5% of the cell dry mass as PHA, at 30 and 4 °C, respectively. This study paves the way for using Antarctic Pseudomonas strains for biosynthesizing novel PHAs from low-cost substrates such as glycerol and the possibility to carry out the bioconversion process for biopolymer synthesis without the need for temperature control.

Indexed as

Antarctic RegionsBiopolymersBioreactorsGlycerolPolyhydroxyalkanoatesPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiopolymersGlycerolPolyhydroxyalkanoatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntarctic PseudomonasExopolysaccharideGlycerolLow temperaturePoly(3-hydroxyalkanoates)Psychrophiles

Identifiers

PMID31089984
OpenAlexW2945712679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.