ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2019
Trophic structure of a tropical soil- and litter-dwelling oribatid mite community and consistency of trophic niches across biomes.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The trophic positions of the most abundant soil- and litter-dwelling oribatid mite species in a tropical monsoon forest in Dong Nai (Cat Tien) National Park, southern Vietnam, were estimated using stable isotope analysis. Previously published data and Layman's metrics were used to compare the structure of the 'isotopic trophic niches' and the range of resources used by Oribatida in the tropical forest to those observed in temperate forests. The range of trophic levels occupied by oribatid mites, as reflected in their nitrogen isotopic compositions, did not differ between tropical and temperate forests. In contrast, the range of δ
Indexed as
Identifiers
31089979What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.