Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089897›Full record

SynthesisOral and maxillofacial surgery2019

Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft-systematic review.

Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho, Guilherme Dos Santos Trento, Lucas Borin Moura, Giovanni Cunha, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli, Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro Henrique de Azambuja CarvalhoDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil. carvalhopha@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-7998
Guilherme Dos Santos TrentoDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil.
Lucas Borin MouraDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil.
Giovanni CunhaDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil.
Marisa Aparecida Cabrini GabrielliDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil.
Valfrido Antônio Pereira-FilhoDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, Dental School at Araraquara - UNESP - São Paulo State University, 1680th Humaitá Street, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/07837-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to perform a systematic review about the use of xenogenous bonegraft in horizontal ridge augmentation to answer the following question: In implant patients, treated with xenografts for horizontal ridge augmentation, what would be the outcomes in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, implant survival, and complication rates?

methodsThe main search was performed at PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, and found 2610 articles. After selection and duplicate removal, 29 studies were included in the final review. The collected data were sample size, number and type of graft, site, horizontal gain, resorption rate, and complications.

resultsA total of 610 patients were submitted to 853 bone grafts, both in the maxilla and mandible. Most studies (n = 26) used particulate grafts, isolated or associated with autogenous bone, and covered by collagen membrane or titanium mesh. The mean of horizontal bone gain was 4.44 mm. In addition, the augmented ridges allowed placement of 1325 successful dental implants. The complication rate was 7.85%, and membrane exposure was the most reported complication.

conclusionsAlthough the autogenous bone graft remains as the gold standard for alveolar reconstruction, this review suggests that xenogenous bone graft is a feasible alternative for horizontal bone augmentation.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationDental ImplantsBone TransplantationDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansMaxillaDental ImplantsAlveolar bone lossAlveolar ridge augmentationBone substitutesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31089897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.