Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089849›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Spectrally fat-suppressed coronal 2D TSE sequences may be more sensitive than 2D STIR for the detection of hyperintense optic nerve lesions.

Tobias D Faizy, Gabriel Broocks, Isabelle Frischmuth, Carina Westermann, Fabian Flottmann, Michael H Schönfeld, Jawed Nawabi, Hannes Leischner, Daniel Kutzner, Jan-Patrick Stellmann and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aliphatic and Olefinic Fat Suppression in the Orbit Using Polarity-altered Spectral and Spatial Selective Acquisition (PASTA) with Opposed Phase.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias D FaizyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. T.Faizy@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-2020
Gabriel BroocksDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Isabelle FrischmuthDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Carina WestermannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Fabian FlottmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Michael H SchönfeldDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jawed NawabiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Hannes LeischnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Daniel KutznerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jan-Patrick StellmannInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph HeesenInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Susanne GellißenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Uta HanningDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study is to compare coronal spectrally fat-suppressed 2D turbo spin-echo (TSE) with 2D short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR) sequences for the detection of optic nerve hyperintensities in patients with acute optic nerve neuritis (ON).

methodsA retrospective review of patients with suspected unilateral ON and pathological visual evoked potentials, who received coronal TSE and STIR sequences with similar fast and clinically feasible acquisition times in addition to our standard imaging protocol. All images were evaluated and compared concerning the presence of optic nerve lesions, lesion lengths, and signal intensities in different anatomical parts of the optic nerves and CNR measures. A summary confidence score (CS) was calculated based on each reader's subjective confidence regarding the scoring items.

resultsInterobserver agreements regarding the detection of optic nerve lesions were excellent for both sequences (TSE, κ = 0.89 and STIR, κ = 0.80). Greater extensions (17.4 ± 6.3 mm vs. 14.1 ± 5.8 mm), as well as higher numbers of optic nerve lesions in symptomatic nerves, were detected on TSE (49/52) compared with STIR (45/52) sequences (both p < 0.001). Overall CS were significantly (p < 0.001) higher for TSE (2.8) compared with STIR (2.1) sequences regarding the presence or absence of optic nerve lesions. CNR ratios of lesions' mean signal intensities vs. ipsilateral surrounding orbital fat and vs. signal intensity measurements from contralateral optic nerves were significantly higher on TSE compared with STIR (p < 0.001 for both comparisons).

conclusionSpectrally fat-suppressed coronal 2D TSE sequences appear to be more sensitive for the detection of hyperintense optic lesions compared with 2D STIR sequences. KEY POINTS: • Spectrally fat-suppressed TSE sequences showed higher detection rates of hyperintense optic nerve lesions, as well as a higher reader confidence scores compared with STIR. • Optic nerve signal abnormalities on TSE sequences were brighter and showed a greater expansion along the optic nerve course. • CNR measures were significantly higher on TSE compared with STIR, when comparing the ratios of mean signal intensities of optic nerve lesions to ipsilateral orbital fat and to contralateral healthy optic nerves of both sequences.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOptic NerveOptic NeuritisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosis: Optic nerve diseasesNeuromyelitis OpticaOrbit

Identifiers

PMID31089849
OpenAlexW2946010357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.