SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2019
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for endometrial cancer-derived peritoneal metastases: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival Difference of Endometrial Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Receiving Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with and without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Expanding the role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A multicenter study on uncommon peritoneal malignancies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Is There a Role for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Due to Uterine Cancer?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Targeted Drug Delivery Biopolymers Effectively Inhibit Breast Tumor Growth and Prevent Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Circumventing Doxorubicin Resistance Using Elastin-like Polypeptide Biopolymer-Mediated Drug Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery in women with advanced uterine serous carcinoma.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: a comparative matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Elastin-Like Polypeptides for Tumor Targeted Delivery of Doxorubicin to Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- HIPEC for gynaecological malignancies: A last update (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is an appropriate treatment for selected patients with endometrial cancer (EC)-derived peritoneal metastases (PM). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CRS in these patients. We performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trials and case reports reporting on the safety and efficacy of CRS and HIPEC in patients with EC-derived PM. Eight publications reporting on 68 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 57.1 years and the mean time from initial treatment of EC to CRS and HIPEC was 22.3 months. 41/64 patients had adenocarcinomas, type II cancers were present in 23/64 patients. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 16.7. A complete surgical resection CC-0 was achieved in 44/63 (70%) patients. The chemotherapy regimens used for HIPEC were variable, but all included cisplatin, administered either alone (39/68 patients) or combined with doxorubicin or paclitaxel or mitomycin (29/68 patients). The duration of HIPEC was 60 min in 51/68 patients and 90 min in 17/68 patients. Mostly, the closed technique was used (55/68 patients). Adverse events grades 1/2, 3, and 4 were observed in 23/63, 12/63, and 6/63 patients, respectively. Treatment-associated mortality was 1% (1/63). After CRS and HIPEC, most patients received systemic chemotherapy (46/63 patients). Median disease-free and overall survival ranged from 7 to 18 and 12 to 33 months, respectively. In conclusion, CRS and HIPEC in EC with PM is safe and feasible. An additional therapeutic value of HIPEC is suggested, but prospective comparative trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.