Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089843›Full record

SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2019

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for endometrial cancer-derived peritoneal metastases: a systematic review.

Clemens B Tempfer, Peter Kern, Askin Dogan, Ziad Hilal, Günther A Rezniczek

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clemens B TempferDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany. clemens.tempfer@rub.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-3258
Peter KernDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Askin DoganDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ziad HilalDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Günther A RezniczekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0852-6002
Ruhr University Bochum · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is an appropriate treatment for selected patients with endometrial cancer (EC)-derived peritoneal metastases (PM). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CRS in these patients. We performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trials and case reports reporting on the safety and efficacy of CRS and HIPEC in patients with EC-derived PM. Eight publications reporting on 68 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 57.1 years and the mean time from initial treatment of EC to CRS and HIPEC was 22.3 months. 41/64 patients had adenocarcinomas, type II cancers were present in 23/64 patients. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 16.7. A complete surgical resection CC-0 was achieved in 44/63 (70%) patients. The chemotherapy regimens used for HIPEC were variable, but all included cisplatin, administered either alone (39/68 patients) or combined with doxorubicin or paclitaxel or mitomycin (29/68 patients). The duration of HIPEC was 60 min in 51/68 patients and 90 min in 17/68 patients. Mostly, the closed technique was used (55/68 patients). Adverse events grades 1/2, 3, and 4 were observed in 23/63, 12/63, and 6/63 patients, respectively. Treatment-associated mortality was 1% (1/63). After CRS and HIPEC, most patients received systemic chemotherapy (46/63 patients). Median disease-free and overall survival ranged from 7 to 18 and 12 to 33 months, respectively. In conclusion, CRS and HIPEC in EC with PM is safe and feasible. An additional therapeutic value of HIPEC is suggested, but prospective comparative trials are warranted.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedMiddle AgedPeritoneal NeoplasmsChemotherapyEndometrial cancerHIPECHyperthermic chemotherapyIntraperitoneal chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID31089843
OpenAlexW2946163751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.