Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089790›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Patellar height measurements: Insall-Salvati ratio is most reliable method.

Fleur V Verhulst, Jordy D P van Sambeeck, Geerte S Olthuis, Jasper van der Ree, Sander Koëter

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Alteration of Insall-Salvati ratio is associated with complications following fixation of patella fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fleur V VerhulstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, 6500 GS, The Netherlands. fleur@verhulst.info.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-8923
Jordy D P van SambeeckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, 6500 GS, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-5046
Geerte S OlthuisRadboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jasper van der ReeDepartment of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sander KoëterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, 6500 GS, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-734X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatella alta is a risk factor for patellofemoral pain and instability. Several measurement methods and imaging modalities are in use to measure patellar height. The first aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interrater reliability of different patellar height measurement methods on conventional radiography (CR), CT and MRI. The second aim was to examine the applicability of patellar height measurement methods originally designed for CR on CT and MRI.

methodsForty-eight patients who were treated for patellar instability were included. All patients had undergone a pre-operative conventional radiograph, CT scan and MRI. Five methods for measuring patellar height were performed on radiographs, CT and MRI by four observers. For each measurement, the intra- and interrater reliability was determined by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman analysis was performed for measurements with an ICC ≥ 0.70.

resultsThe Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio was the only measurement that showed good intra- and inter-observer reliability on CR, CT and MRI. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the patellotrochlear index (PTI) for MRI was good to excellent for all observers. The IS ratio showed a moderate to good reliability for comparison of all three imaging modalities with the best agreement between radiography and MRI. The other patellar height measurements showed only poor to moderate inter-method agreement.

conclusionIn this study, the Insall-Salvati ratio shows better intra- and inter-observer reliability than the Blackburne-Peel ratio, the Caton-Deschamps ratio and the modified Insall-Salvati ratio on all imaging modalities. Radiography and CT seem to have better reliability than MRI. The patellotrochlear index, however, shows good inter- and intra-observer reliability on MRI. Only for the IS method was there acceptable agreement between CR and MRI. This means that the established Insall-Salvati normal values could be used for MRI as well. This study shows that the most reliable method to measure patella height is the Insall-Salvati ratio measured on conventional radiographs or the patellotrochlear index on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II diagnostic.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPatellaRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCTInter-observer reliabilityMRIPatellar heightRadiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.