ReviewDer Orthopade2019
[Spondylolisthesis in the growing spine].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical finite element methods study of a novel internal fixation system for lumbar spondylolysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- [Radiological diagnostics of lumbar spine fractures].Der Radiologe · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpondylolisthesis (Greek for sliding vertebra) in children is usually the result of a defect (=lysis) or an elongation of the interarticular portion. The cause can be a congenital dysplasia of the dorsal stabilizing structures or pressure of the facet on the interarticular portion. This is a consequence of lumbar lordosis which is necessary for an upright posture. TREATMENT: The treatment depends on the symptoms and the risk of progression. This is related to the sliding distance, the degree of secondary dysplasia of the vertebral bodies and the sagittal profile, which is considered in the Mac-Thiong classification. For low-grade olistheses, conservative therapy is an option; for a symptomatic lysis without disc degeneration, pars repair should be considered. In higher-grade olistheses, repositioning and spondylodesis are usually recommended. Repositioning improves the fusion rate and sagittal profile, but increases the risk of nerve root damage, so complete repositioning should not be forced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.