Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089684›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019

Novel and conserved functions of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase in tomato.

Adil Hussain, Byung-Wook Yun, Ji Hyun Kim, Kapuganti Jagadis Gupta, Nam-In Hyung, Gary J Loake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Crucial Role of SlGSNOR in Regulating Postharvest Tomato Fruit Ripening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In Silico Characterisation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Enhanced Resistance ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Role of Nitric Oxide in Plant Senescence.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adil HussainDepartment of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Byung-Wook YunSchool of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun KimDepartment of Plant and Food Sciences, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Kapuganti Jagadis GuptaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, Delhi, India.
Nam-In HyungDepartment of Plant and Food Sciences, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Gary J LoakeInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/DO11809/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H000984/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as a key signalling molecule in plants. The chief mechanism for the transfer of NO bioactivity is thought to be S-nitrosylation, the addition of an NO moiety to a protein cysteine thiol to form an S-nitrosothiol (SNO). The enzyme S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) indirectly controls the total levels of cellular S-nitrosylation, by depleting S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), the major cellular NO donor. Here we show that depletion of GSNOR function impacts tomato (Solanum lycopersicum. L) fruit development. Thus, reduction of GSNOR expression through RNAi modulated both fruit formation and yield, establishing a novel function for GSNOR. Further, depletion of S. lycopersicum GSNOR (SlGSNOR) additionally impacted a number of other developmental processes, including seed development, which also has not been previously linked with GSNOR activity. In contrast to Arabidopsis, depletion of GSNOR function did not influence root development. Further, reduction of GSNOR transcript abundance compromised plant immunity. Surprisingly, this was in contrast to previous data in Arabidopsis that reported that reducing Arabidopsis thaliana GSNOR (AtGSNOR) expression by antisense technology increased disease resistance. We also show that increased SlGSNOR expression enhanced pathogen protection, uncovering a potential strategy to enhance disease resistance in crop plants. Collectively, our findings reveal, at the genetic level, that some but not all GSNOR activities are conserved outside the Arabidopsis reference system. Thus, manipulating the extent of GSNOR expression may control important agricultural traits in tomato and possibly other crop plants.

Indexed as

Aldehyde OxidoreductasesDisease ResistanceFruitNitric OxidePlant DiseasesPlant ImmunitySolanum lycopersicumAldehyde Oxidoreductasesformaldehyde dehydrogenase, glutathione-independentNitric OxideClimacteric fruitfruit developmentGSNORMicroTomnitric oxideNOS-nitrosationS-nitrosylationtomatotomato fruit

Identifiers

PMID31089684
PMCPMC6760305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.