ArticleVeterinary world2019
The detection of gastrointestinal parasites in owned and shelter dogs in Cebu, Philippines.
Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging zoonotic diseases in Southeast Asia in the period 2011-2022: a systematic literature review.The veterinary quarterly · 2024Pooled it
- Microscopic and molecular identification ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of dogs in four districts of central Ethiopia: Prevalence and risk factors.PloS one · 2025Article
- Survey of Gastrointestinal Parasites and Lungworms in Cats and Dogs from Terceira and São Miguel Islands, Azores.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pets: Retrospective study at the veterinary teaching hospital, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- General knowledge and practice of household dog owners regarding gastrointestinal parasites in Cebu, Philippines.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Canine hookworms in the Philippines-Very common but very much neglected in veterinary research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Prevalence ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022Article
- Oxidative Stress and High-Mobility Group Box 1 Assay in Dogs with Gastrointestinal Parasites.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Seroprevalence of toxocariasis among allergic patients in Kuwait and its association with eosinophilia.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal tract (GIT) parasites affect the health of dogs and may also be zoonotic. The prevalence of these parasites has been well studied in several countries, but reports in the Philippines have been limited.
aimThis study generally aimed to detect the presence of common GIT parasites in owned and shelter dogs in Cebu, Philippines. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 200 fecal samples (130 from owned dogs and 70 from shelter dogs) were collected. Profiles of owned dogs and their owners were obtained. Fecalysis was performed using three methods: Direct smear, sedimentation, and flotation techniques.
resultsMajority of the sampled dogs were 5 years old and below that (79.2%), male (64.6%) and of pure breed (53.1%). Among the most common parasites detected were
conclusionGIT parasites were detected in owned and shelter dogs in Cebu, Philippines. The results of this study can serve as baseline information about the canine parasitic fauna in the Philippines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.