ArticleEye (London, England)2019
Which intraocular lens would ophthalmologists choose for themselves?
Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing GPT-4o in cataract surgery decision-making: appropriateness, consistency, and clinical implications.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Female predominance and socio-demographic inequalities in global near vision loss burden: projected trends and disparities from 1990 to 2035.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Exploring patient preferences for intraocular lenses selection in age-related cataract: a discrete choice experiment study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A survey of intraocular lens preferences of UK refractive surgeons for cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Screening for multifocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients in a public hospital.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Effect of low-degree astigmatism on the objective visual quality.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Comparison of postoperative visual performance between trifocal intraocular lens and monofocal intraocular lens.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Analysis of Korean Retinal Specialists' Opinions on Implanting Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Underlying Retinal Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Visual Quality and Visual Function of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Made from the Same Material, but with Different Design and Optics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Iberoamerican Ophthalmologists IOL Selection for Use on Themselves: Survey Results.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Factors associated with good near vision after cataract surgery with monofocal intraocular lens implantation at a tertiary eye hospital in southern India.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeContemporary cataract surgery is increasingly customizable with the advent of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) and the femtosecond laser. The purpose of this study was to determine the types of IOLs ophthalmologists choose for themselves and whether demographic characteristics, surgical experience, and attitudes of ophthalmologists might influence their decision-making. Additional goals included evaluating the use of femtosecond laser use in cataract surgery and investigating surgeon IOL preferences for their patients.
methodsWe distributed a 29-question Survey Monkey survey to senior ophthalmology residents and practicing ophthalmologists and received 347 responses during a 1-month period. We analyzed 328 surveys using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests.
resultsMain outcome measures included surgeons' personal preferences for choice of IOL, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, and IOL preference for patients. In the setting of no astigmatism, 61.3% of respondents would choose a monofocal IOL set for either distance or monovision for their own surgery. For corneal astigmatism >1.25 D, 60.3% of respondents would choose a toric monofocal lens and only 6.9% would want a femtosecond laser or manual LRI for their own surgery. Of the respondents, 34.6% perform femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, but only 15.3% would want femtosecond cataract surgery performed on themselves. Also, 67.7% implant presbyopia-correcting IOLs (diffractive echelette, multifocal, or accommodative). When correcting for patients' corneal astigmatism >1.25 D, 65.7% of respondents preferred a toric monofocal IOL.
conclusionOphthalmologists value quality of vision and are risk averse. Overall, a surgeons' personal preference for their own surgery is correlated with past surgical experience with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.