ReviewThe American journal of case reports2019
Aerococcus Viridans: Case Report, Microbiology, and Literature Review.
Review in The American journal of case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Aerococcus viridans in granulomatous mastitis utilizing nanopore targeted sequencing: case report and short literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Biological characterization of the phage lysin AVPL and its efficiency againstApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Compounds from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Potential Functions as Functional Food in Dietetics and the Food Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Characteristics of Aerococcus viridans isolated from porcine fetuses in Korean farms.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
- The Faecal Microbiome of Building-Dwelling Insectivorous Bats (Myotis myotis and Rhinolophus hipposideros) also Contains Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Representatives.Current microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aerococcus viridans are Gram-positive, catalase and oxidase-negative, microaerophilic, and non-motile bacteria species that are rarely associated with human infections such as arthritis, bacteremia, endocarditis, and meningitis. The bacteria are also fastidious (i.e., have complex nutritional requirements) and often confused with Streptococci species or treated as a contaminant. CASE REPORT We report a case of Aerococcus septicemia in an 85-year-old female patient, who transferred from a nursing home to an acute care hospital in Washington DC, USA. She had a 2-day history of worsening mental status, fever of 38.9°C (102°F), and tachycardia. Urinalysis revealed numerous white blood cells and bacteria. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count of 14 000 cells/mL (85% neutrophils, 8% lymphocytes, 5% bands, and 2% monocytes), hemoglobin of 12.6 g/dL, and serum creatinine of 0.8 mg/dL. Blood and urine cultures obtained during admission grew penicillin-resistant A. viridans, identified via matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) on day 3 of admission. The patient received empiric vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam, and we deescalated to vancomycin monotherapy to complete a 14-day treatment course. CONCLUSIONS This case report highlights the role of MALDI-TOF for identifying fastidious organisms, and we were able to form a better clinical correlation between patient symptoms and causative organisms. We believe that antimicrobial therapy (in accordance with susceptibility results) should be initiated in symptomatic patients who have A. viridans isolated in significant amounts in urine or from a sterile site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.