Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088886›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2019

Family medicine residents' perspectives on curricular messaging surrounding enhanced skills fellowship programs.

Lauren Payne, Azadeh Moaveni, Curtis Handford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hidden Curriculum in Medical Residency Programs: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  4. Valuing our past, sustaining our future: Generalists of tomorrow.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren PayneFamily physician with the Toronto Western Family Health Team and Lecturer in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario. lauren.payne@uhn.ca.
Azadeh MoaveniFamily physician with the Toronto Western Family Health Team, and Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Medical Education Program Director in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
Curtis HandfordFamily physician with the Department of Family and Community Medicine at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, and Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo better understand the messages that family medicine residents receive about enhanced skills fellowship programs throughout their training.

designPhenomenologic approach using structured qualitative interviews.

settingPostgraduate family medicine program in Ontario.

participantsEleven family medicine residents (5 first-year and 6 second-year residents) from 4 separate training sites.

methodsInterviews were audiotaped and codes were developed by the study investigators. Themes arose from the data via the immersion and crystallization technique. MAIN

findingsThemes emerged in 3 categories: perception of purpose, sources of messaging, and formal or informal versus hidden curricular messages. Fellowship programs were viewed by residents in terms of their personal and professional benefits. Residents learned about fellowship programs through word of mouth and from role models. The formal curriculum remained neutral about fellowship training. The hidden curriculum highlighted a number of messages: a) to maximize chances of acceptance into some fellowship programs, one should focus most of his or her elective time in that clinical area; b) many fellowships graduate subspecialists to the exclusion of family medicine; c) a fellowship is required to practise in a large urban centre but is not required to practise in rural communities; and d) those without fellowship training are less well regarded.

conclusionResidents receive mixed messages regarding fellowship training. This might be a phenomenon isolated to a larger urban centre in Ontario. Decision making at the individual level in terms of career path seems to be affected and might have implications at the larger system level.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceCurriculumFamily PracticeFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyInterviews as TopicMaleOntarioQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID31088886
PMCPMC6516706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.