Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088885›Full record

SynthesisCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2019

Opioid use disorder in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews.

Christina Korownyk, Danielle Perry, Joey Ton, Michael R Kolber, Scott Garrison, Betsy Thomas, G Michael Allan, Nicolas Dugré, Caitlin R Finley, Rhonda Ting and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Management of opioid use disorder: 2024 update to the national clinical practice guideline.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Managing opioid use disorder in primary care: PEER simplified guideline.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  19. Caring for people with opioid use disorders.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christina KorownykFamily physician and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. cpoag@ualberta.ca.
Danielle PerryNurse and Clinical Evidence Expert at the Alberta College of Family Physicians in Edmonton.
Joey TonPharmacist and Clinical Evidence Expert at the College of Family Physicians of Canada in Mississauga, Ont.
Michael R KolberFamily physician and Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
Scott GarrisonFamily physician and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
Betsy ThomasPharmacist; Project Manager, Education and Knowledge Translation at the Alberta College of Family Physicians; and Assistant Adjunct Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
G Michael AllanFamily physician, Director of Programs and Practice Support at the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
Nicolas DugréPharmacist at the CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal and Clinical Associate Professor in the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montreal in Quebec.
Caitlin R FinleyMedical student at the University of Alberta.
Rhonda TingDoctoral student in the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Alberta.
Peter Ran YangMedical student at the University of Alberta.
Ben VandermeerResearch Associate at the Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence.
Adrienne J LindbladPharmacist and Knowledge Translation and Evidence Coordinator at the Alberta College of Family Physicians and Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the best available evidence regarding various topics related to primary care management of opioid use disorder (OUD). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google, and the references of included studies and relevant guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Published systematic reviews and newer randomized controlled trials from the past 5 to 10 years that investigated patient-oriented outcomes related to managing OUD in primary care, diagnosis, pharmacotherapies (including buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone), tapering strategies, psychosocial interventions, prescribing practices, and management of comorbidities. SYNTHESIS: From 8626 articles, 39 systematic reviews and an additional 26 randomized controlled trials were included. New meta-analyses were performed where possible. One cohort study suggests 1 case-finding tool might be reasonable to assist with diagnosis (positive likelihood ratio of 10.3). Meta-analysis demonstrated that retention in treatment improves when buprenorphine or methadone are used (64% to 73% vs 22% to 39% for control), when OUD is treated in primary care (86% vs 67% in specialty care, risk ratio [RR] of 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47), and when counseling is added to pharmacotherapy (74% vs 62% for controls, RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.36). Retention was also improved with naltrexone (33% vs 25% for controls, RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.64) and reduced with medication-related contingency management (eg, loss of take-home doses as a punitive measure; 68% vs 77% for no contingency, RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99).

conclusionThere is reasonable evidence that patients with OUD should be managed in the primary care setting. Diagnostic criteria for OUD remain elusive, with 1 reasonable case-finding tool. Methadone and buprenorphine improve treatment retention, while medication-related contingency methods could worsen retention. Counseling is beneficial when added to pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCounselingHumansMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID31088885
PMCPMC6516704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.