ArticleClinical lung cancer2019
Chemotherapy and Radiation Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Elderly Patients With N3 Stage IIIB NSCLC.
Article in Clinical lung cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting Cullin-RING E3 Ligases for Radiosensitization: From NEDDylation Inhibition to PROTACs.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandard treatment for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (chemo-RT). However, N3 stage IIIB disease portends a worse prognosis and the tolerability of chemo-RT in patients ≥70 years old is a concern. In this analysis, we evaluate the survival of patients with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC who were treated with chemo-RT or chemotherapy alone with a focus on elderly patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC between 2010 and 2013 using the National Cancer Database. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who underwent chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for median OS with log rank tests. Multivariable Cox models were used for multivariable and subgroup analyses.
resultsWe included 9769 patients in our analysis, 7770 of whom received chemo-RT and 1999 who received chemotherapy alone. The median OS for patients who received chemo-RT was 16.4 months versus 12.7 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). The median OS for patients ≥70 years old who received chemo-RT was 15.0 months versus 12.4 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). In multivariable analyses, the benefit of chemo-RT was similar regardless of age. Subgroup analyses in patients ≥70 years indicated a benefit of chemo-RT (hazard ratio, <1.0) across all patient and disease strata.
conclusionSurvival was improved in elderly patients who received chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone for N3 stage IIIB NSCLC. Our findings suggest that age and comorbidities should not preclude clinicians from recommending chemo-RT to these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.