Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088547›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Prediction of response to pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer with immunohistochemical phenotyping based on gene expression profiles.

S Visser, J Hou, K Bezemer, L L de Vogel, J P J J Hegmans, B H Stricker, S Philipsen, J G J V Aerts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S VisserDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
J HouDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
K BezemerDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L L de VogelDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J P J J HegmansDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
B H StrickerDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S PhilipsenDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J G J V AertsDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands. j.aerts@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 1520001017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative pemetrexed-based chemotherapy remains a standard of care treatment for the majority of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, no predictive markers for pemetrexed treatment are available.

methodsResected tumour samples from pemetrexed-naïve NSCLC patients were collected. Gene expression profiling with respect to predicted sensitivity to pemetrexed classified predicted responders (60%) and non-responders (40%) based on differentially expressed genes encoding for pemetrexed target enzymes. Genes showing a strong correlation with these target genes were selected for measurement of corresponding protein expressions by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. A semi-quantitative IHC scoring method was applied to construct a prediction model for response to pemetrexed. A retrospective cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was used for external validation.

resultsFrom ninety-one patients resected tumour samples were collected. The majority of patients had early or locally advanced NSCLC (96.3%). Gene expression profiling revealed five markers, which mRNA levels strongly correlated to pemetrexed target genes mRNA levels: TPX2, CPA3, EZH2, MCM2 and TOP2A. Of 63 (69%) patients IHC staining scores of these markers were obtained, which significantly differed between predicted non-responders and responders (P < 0.05). The optimized prediction model included EZH2 (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90) and TPX2 (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.01). The model had a sensitivity of 86.8%, specificity of 63.6% and showed a good ability to distinct between responders and non-responders (C-index 0.86). In the external study population (N = 23) the majority of patients had metastatic NSCLC (95.7%). Partial response (PR) was established in 26.1%. The sensitivity decreased drastically to 33.3%, with a specificity of 82.4% and a C-index of 0.73.

conclusionsUsing external validation this prediction model with IHC staining of target enzyme correlated markers showed a good discrimination, but lacked sensitivity. The role of IHC markers as response predictors for pemetrexed in clinical practice remains questionable.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPemetrexedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorPemetrexedGene-expression profilingImmunohistochemistryNSCLCPemetrexedResponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID31088547
PMCPMC6515672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.