Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088535›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Glutamine to proline conversion is associated with response to glutaminase inhibition in breast cancer.

Maria T Grinde, Bylgja Hilmarsdottir, Hanna Maja Tunset, Ida Marie Henriksen, Jana Kim, Mads H Haugen, Morten Beck Rye, Gunhild M Mælandsmo, Siver A Moestue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to Study Cancer Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. [Glutamine metabolic reprogramming in regulating the occurrence and development of osteosarcoma].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Serum metabolomic profiling for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial.Amino acids · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of the PdInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria T GrindeDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7489, Trondheim, Norway. maria.t.grinde@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-2222
Bylgja HilmarsdottirDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hanna Maja TunsetDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7489, Trondheim, Norway.
Ida Marie HenriksenDepartment of Physics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Jana KimDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7489, Trondheim, Norway.
Mads H HaugenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Morten Beck RyeDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Gunhild M MælandsmoDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Siver A MoestueDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOslo University Hospital · NONord University · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlutaminase inhibitors target cancer cells by blocking the conversion of glutamine to glutamate, thereby potentially interfering with anaplerosis and synthesis of amino acids and glutathione. The drug CB-839 has shown promising effects in preclinical experiments and is currently undergoing clinical trials in several human malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, response to glutaminase inhibitors is variable and there is a need for identification of predictive response biomarkers. The aim of this study was to determine how glutamine is utilized in two patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of breast cancer representing luminal-like/ER+ (MAS98.06) and basal-like/triple-negative (MAS98.12) breast cancer and to explore the metabolic effects of CB-839 treatment. EXPERIMENTAL: MAS98.06 and MAS98.12 PDX mice received CB-839 (200 mg/kg) or drug vehicle two times daily p.o. for up to 28 days (n = 5 per group), and the effect on tumor growth was evaluated. Expression of 60 genes and seven glutaminolysis key enzymes were determined using gene expression microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, in untreated tumors. Uptake and conversion of glutamine were determined in the PDX models using HR MAS MRS after i.v. infusion of [5-

resultsTumor growth measurements showed that CB-839 significantly inhibited tumor growth in MAS98.06 tumors, but not in MAS98.12 tumors. Gene expression and IHC analysis indicated a higher proline synthesis from glutamine in untreated MAS98.06 tumors. This was confirmed by HR MAS MRS of untreated tumors demonstrating that MAS98.06 used glutamine to produce proline, glutamate, and alanine, and MAS98.12 to produce glutamate and lactate. In both models, treatment with CB-839 resulted in accumulation of glutamine. In addition, CB-839 caused depletion of alanine, proline, and glutamate ([1-13C] glutamate) in the MAS98.06 model.

conclusionOur findings indicate that TNBCs may not be universally sensitive to glutaminase inhibitors. The major difference in the metabolic fate of glutamine between responding MAS98.06 xenografts and non-responding MAS98.12 xenografts is the utilization of glutamine for production of proline. We therefore suggest that addiction to proline synthesis from glutamine is associated with response to CB-839 in breast cancer. The effect of glutaminase inhibition in two breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGlutaminaseGlutamineHumansImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsMiceBiomarkersEnzyme InhibitorsGlutaminaseGlutamineProline13C MRSAldehyde dehydrogenase 18 family member A1 (ALDH18A1)Cancer treatmentCB-839Gene expression analysisGlutaminaseGlutaminase inhibitorHigh-resolution magic angle spinning MR spectroscopy (HR MAS MRS)ImmunohistochemistryPatient-derived xenograft (PDX)

Identifiers

PMID31088535
PMCPMC6518522
OpenAlexW2947079695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.