Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088503›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2019

Retraction Note: Improving usability and pregnancy rates of a fertility monitor by an additional mobile application: results of a retrospective efficacy study of Daysy and DaysyView app.

Martin C Koch, Johannes Lermann, Niels van de Roemer, Simone K Renner, Stefanie Burghaus, Janina Hackl, Ralf Dittrich, Sven Kehl, Patricia G Oppelt, Thomas Hildebrandt and 4 more

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Martin C KochFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany. martin.koch@uk-erlangen.de.
Johannes LermannFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Niels van de RoemerFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Simone K RennerFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefanie BurghausFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Janina HacklFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Ralf DittrichFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sven KehlFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Patricia G OppeltFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas HildebrandtFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Caroline C HackFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Uwe G PöhlsFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan P RennerFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.
Falk C ThielFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91,054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

.

Identifiers

PMID31088503
PMCPMC6515608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.