Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088466›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Severe malaria management: current situation, challenges and lessons learned from Gezira State, Sudan.

Fahad A Elnour, Mohammed E A Alagib, Devendra Bansal, Elmoubasher Abu Baker Abd Farag, Elfatih M Malik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fahad A ElnourCommunicable & Non Communicable Diseases Control Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Nile St, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed E A AlagibPlanning and International Health Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Nile St, Khartoum, Sudan.
Devendra BansalCommunicable Diseases Control Programmes, Public Health Department, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
Elmoubasher Abu Baker Abd FaragCommunicable Diseases Control Programmes, Public Health Department, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar. eabdfarag@moph.gov.qa.
Elfatih M MalikPlanning and International Health Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Nile St, Khartoum, Sudan. fatihmmalik@gmail.com.
Federal Ministry of Health · SDMinistry of Public Health · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate the management of severe malaria at Gezira State hospitals in Sudan by assessing hospital readiness, health care provider knowledge and the care received by severe malaria patients.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was performed to assess the severe malaria management practices at hospitals level in Gezira State. The study population included hospitals, health care providers and patients. Data was collected using checklists and structured questionnaires.

resultsA total of 20 hospitals, 158 health care providers and 370 patients were included in the study. Out of the total hospitals, 95% (19/20) were providing 24 h outpatient services, 65% (13/20) had ICU units, while triage system was found in only 35% (7/20) of hospitals. From all hospitals evaluated, 90% (18/20) were suffering from shortage of staff, especially doctors. About half of the health care providers (46.7%) did not receive severe malaria management training. The average knowledge score among health care providers was 55.4%. Microscopy was available in all hospitals (100%), while rapid diagnostic test, complete blood count and renal function test were available in 15 hospitals (75%). Fever was the most presenting symptom (97.8%) followed by repeated vomiting (51.4%), convulsion in children (24.3%) and prostration in adult (57.9%). Correctly diagnosed patients were 68.9%. Essential tests were done for only 11.1% of patients. Majority of patients (91.7%) were treated with quinine, 5.9% received artemether, while 2.4% were treated with artemether-lumefantrine. Those who received both the correct dose and dosing regimen were 53.8%. The overall compliance to guidelines was 2.2%.

conclusionThis study highlights the fact that management of severe malaria at hospital level was suboptimal with serious shortcomings in the different aspects of care particularly in specialized hospitals. Technical staff was inadequate, hospitals were anguish from defective emergency services, and most patients were not treated according to the national guidelines.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAntimalarialsArtemisininsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansMalariaMalePatient CareSudanSurveys and QuestionnairesAntimalarialsArtemisininsAnti-malarialComplianceGezira State and SudanGuidelineHospital readinessMalariaProviders’ knowledgeSupportive treatment

Identifiers

PMID31088466
PMCPMC6515598
OpenAlexW2945316958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.