Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088433›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study.

Mirte Boelens, Dafna A Windhorst, Harrie Jonkman, Clemens M H Hosman, Hein Raat, Wilma Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High Systolic Blood Pressure of High-Income African American Children.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mirte BoelensDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dafna A WindhorstDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Harrie JonkmanVerwey-Jonker Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clemens M H HosmanDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Hein RaatDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wilma JansenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. w.jansen.1@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-9054
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLVerwey Jonker Institute · NL

Funding

ZonMw 531001313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing socioeconomic health inequalities among youth is a major challenge for governments around the world and reports on successful attempts are scarce. Socioecological and integral approaches with collaborative partnerships and community engagement are recommended but knowledge about the effectiveness and effective and ineffective elements is limited. The Promising Neighbourhoods program employs such an approach aiming to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health, safety and talent development in youth. We will evaluate the process-implementation, and effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. METHODS/

designCore elements of Promising Neighbourhoods are a collaborative community programming approach with stakeholders, data-based priority setting, knowledge-, and theory-based policies and evidence-based interventions. Community stakeholders and key-leaders from the neighbourhoods are engaged in the program. For this evaluation study the program will be implemented in three intervention neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods will be compared to three control neighbourhoods at baseline in 2018/2019 and at follow-up in 2020/2021 after full implementation of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. Intervention neighbourhoods receive a tailored intervention-package including evidence-based interventions and additional measures by community stakeholders. In control neighbourhoods, no special planning will take place thus interventions are offered as usual. A mixed-methods approach following the stages of the logic model from program is applied for this evaluation. Questionnaires, focus groups, and registration data will be collected among community stakeholders, key-leaders, and youth to evaluate the process-implementation of the program. Indicators of intermediate and ultimate outcomes will be studied among N = 818 children and N = 818 youngsters using difference-in-difference regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. DISCUSSION: Hypotheses are that a collaborative community approach with stakeholders leads to clear priority-setting and better tailored interventions of better quality. We further hypothesise a decline in socioeconomic inequalities in intermediate and ultimate outcomes for health, safety and talent development in the intervention neighbourhoods in comparison to control neighbourhoods. The results add knowledge about effective and ineffective elements of collaborative community programming approaches to reduce health inequalities in youth and thus are relevant for local and national public health authorities.

trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register number NL7279 . Date of registration: 26-Sept-2018.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdolescentChildCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHealth Plan ImplementationHumansNetherlandsProgram EvaluationRegression AnalysisResearch DesignResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenCollaborationCommunity-basedEvaluationHealthSocioeconomic preventionStakeholder participationYouth

Identifiers

PMID31088433
PMCPMC6515662
OpenAlexW2945450321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.