Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088431›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

How should assent to research be sought in low income settings? Perspectives from parents and children in Southern Malawi.

Helen Mangochi, Kate Gooding, Aisleen Bennett, Michael Parker, Nicola Desmond, Susan Bull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen MangochiMalawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre, 3, Malawi. hmangochi@mlw.mw.ORCID 0000-0002-0246-4824
Kate GoodingMalawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre, 3, Malawi.
Aisleen BennettMalawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre, 3, Malawi.
Michael ParkerEthox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX37LF, UK.
Nicola DesmondMalawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre, 3, Malawi.
Susan BullEthox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX37LF, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 096527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric research in low-income countries is essential to tackle high childhood mortality. As with all research, consent is an essential part of ethical practice for paediatric studies. Ethics guidelines recommend that parents or another proxy provide legal consent for children to participate, but that children should be involved in the decision through providing assent. However, there remain uncertainties about how to judge when children are ready to give assent and about appropriate assent processes. Malawi does not yet have detailed guidelines on assent. Understanding perspectives among children and their parents can assist in developing contextually-appropriate assent guidance.

methodsQualitative research was conducted with children and parents in three settings in Southern Malawi (low- and high-income urban and rural), to take account of any variations between socioeconomic and cultural contexts. In each setting, interviews were conducted with parents and their children who had participated in paediatric research to understand their experiences of assent and views on appropriate assent practice. Focus groups were also conducted with children and parents, to understand broader social perspectives.

resultsWe found widespread support for involving children in decisions on research participation. Participants identified a range of factors that affect children's capacity to give assent, including intellectual capacity, emotional development, life experience and cultural norms. Age was often mentioned as a consideration, but deemed an unreliable sole indicator of capacity to assent. In relation to appropriate assent processes, participants emphasised considerations such as supporting effective understanding and minimizing harms. Views on how to achieve these aims varied; for example, there were different ideas about the appropriate order in which to approach children and parents, and about whose decision to respect in the event of disagreement.

conclusionsParents and children agreed about the value of involving children in decisions on research, and about the need to promote children's decision-making capacity while respecting parents' interests in children's welfare. Developing practical guidance that meets these principles is challenging, particularly given the need for flexible approaches that suit different study types, children's capacities and family environments. Further discussion within the Malawi research and ethics community will help develop contextually-appropriate guidelines.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInformed ConsentInformed Consent By MinorsInterviews as TopicMalawiMaleMiddle AgedParentsPatient SelectionAssentChildConsent*decision making/es [ethics]*EthicsMalawiPaediatric researchResearch

Identifiers

PMID31088431
PMCPMC6515587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.