Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31088364›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Comparison of the efficiency of different cell lysis methods and different commercial methods for RNA extraction from Candida albicans stored in RNAlater.

Antonio Rodríguez, Mario Vaneechoutte

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A culture-free biphasic approach for sensitive and rapid detection of pathogens in dried whole-blood matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Automated molecular testing of saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Bio-protocol · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio RodríguezLaboratory Bacteriology Research, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. antoniojrodri86@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-5912
Mario VaneechoutteLaboratory Bacteriology Research, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObtaining sufficient RNA yield and quality for comprehensive transcriptomic studies is cumbersome for clinical samples in which RNA from the pathogen is present in low numbers relative to the nucleic acids from the host, especially for pathogens, such as yeasts, with a solid cell wall. Therefore, yeast cell lysis including cell wall disruption constitutes an essential first step to maximize RNA yield. Moreover, during the last years, different methods for RNA extraction from yeasts have been developed, ranging from classic hot phenol methods to commercially available specific kits. They offer different RNA yield and quality, also depending on the original storage medium, such as RNAlater.

resultsWe observed that, for C. albicans cells stored in Tryptic Soy Broth with 15% glycerol, 10 min of bead beating in a horizontal position in RiboPure Lysis Buffer provided complete cell lysis. Cell lysis efficiency was decreased to 73.5% when cells were stored in RNAlater. In addition, the RiboPure Yeast Kit (Ambion) offered the highest RNA yield in comparison with the automated platform NucliSENS easyMAG total nucleic extraction (bioMérieux) and the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to NanoDrop and Fragment Analyzer. Moreover, we showed that, in spite of the decrease of cell lysis efficiency after RNAlater storage, as compared to storage in TSB + 15% glycerol, RNAlater increased RNA yield during RNA extraction with both RiboPure Yeast Kit and easyMAG, as confirmed by Fragment Analyzer analysis and by RT-qPCR of the RNA from the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2.

conclusionsIn our hands, the most efficient cell lysis and highest RNA yield from C. albicans cells stored in RNAlater was obtained by horizontal bead beating in RiboPure Lysis Buffer followed by RNA extraction with the RiboPure Yeast Kit.

Indexed as

BuffersCandida albicansCell WallMolecular BiologyNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPreservation, BiologicalRNA, FungalSpecimen HandlingBuffersRNA, FungalCandida albicansCell lysisRNA extraction

Identifiers

PMID31088364
PMCPMC6515685
OpenAlexW2946978278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.