ArticleBMC medical research methodology2019
Q sample construction: a novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Q-methodology in chronic disease research: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Understanding cognitive errors in clinical decision-making: a Q methodology approach.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Perspectives on innovation of the diagnostic process in general practice: Q-methodological study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- How to design a Q-sample: A seven-step approach based on interview data.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring feasible factors to improve the practice of chronic kidney disease prevention among healthcare professionals in syria: a Q-methodology study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Institutional Design of Forest Landscape Restoration in Central Togo: Informing Policy-making through Q Methodology Analysis.Environmental management · 2025Article
- Developing a Q Set Using the Modified Delphi Technique to Investigate ICU Nurses' Perspectives on Working with Non-ICU Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Actor Perceptions of the Governance Framework and Non-Carbon Benefits from the Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program: An Extended Q-Study of the Juabuso-Bia Hotspot Intervention Area.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Bridging the Gap: Using Consensus to Explore Entrustment Decisions and Feedback Receptivity in Competency-Based Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Through the Construction of a Q-Sample Incorporating a Delphi Technique.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Factors affecting the value revitalization of Qajar religious schools in Tehran.Heritage science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQ methodology is an evidenced approach to researching subjectivity, involving a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The methodology has been used successfully in healthcare research to explore the opinions of patients and healthcare providers about topics such as the illness experience, healthcare services, clinical practice and professional training. Q methodology studies require the generation of a Q sample, a set of opinion statements representing the phenomenon of interest. This paper describes a novel and rigorous approach to develop a Q sample for a study exploring misusers' opinions about over-the-counter (OTC) codeine dependence and critically examines the associated methodological issues.
methodsDevelopment of the Q sample in this study involved three steps; (1) identification of opinion statements via a comprehensive literature search, (2) application of a theoretical framework, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour, to group and then reduce the number of statements and (3) use of a Delphi technique to achieve expert consensus on the final selection of statements. The Delphi component involved a multidisciplinary panel of 15 addiction experts comprised of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, psychologists and researchers, who were recruited purposively. Experts rated each statement using a 5-point scale of perceived importance. Two Delphi rounds were undertaken and consensus for inclusion of a statement was set at a median score of ≥4 and an interquartile range of ≤1.
resultsA total of 842 statements representing codeine misusers' opinions about OTC codeine dependence were identified from the literature. Statements were grouped thematically using the COM-B framework and representative statements were selected, reducing the number to 111. After two Delphi rounds, addiction experts achieved consensus on 46 statements which formed the final Q sample.
conclusionsThis paper describes a new and systematic approach to Q sample construction and explores associated methodological issues that could be useful for those considering Q methodology and for furthering the rigour of this research technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.