ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2019
[Long-acting antipsychotics: The QAAPAPLE algorithm review].
Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Care Pathways, Health Service Use Patterns and Opportunities for Justice Involvement Prevention Among Forensic Mental Health Clients.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022Article
- Real-world effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly REACT study: Pooled analysis of two noninterventional studies.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Article
- "Real world" clinical effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly injectable in early psychosis patients.Psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- The Evolution of Long-Acting Antipsychotics Use in Québec between 2003 and 2017.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020Article
- Aripiprazole Long-Acting Injection During First Episode Schizophrenia-An Exploratory Analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEight years ago, a committee of experts from 4 Quebec university psychiatry departments has provided the QAAPAPLE algorithm in order to guide clinicians in their use of long-acting antipsychotics (LAAP) for patients with psychotic disorders.
objectiveUpdate the QAAPAPLE algorithm.
methodsUsing a qualitative and selective literature review, the experts have focused on several aspects related to the use of LAAP and the relevance of modifying the algorithm: 1) new data on LAAP (including polypharmacy and co-prescription with clozapine, dose frequency/interval); 2) perception and attitude regarding algorithms and evidence; 3) difficulties in implementing algorithms; 4) polypharmacy involving LAAP and co-prescriptions with clozapine; 5) partner patients perspective on the algorithm.
resultsThirteen meta-analysis were published and completed observational studies (including those on national registries), confirming the LAAP benefits. Literature adds specifications about using some drug associations as well as dose frequency and interval. Therefore, scientific advances have been considered to modify the algorithm.
conclusionInteracting with Quebec psychiatrists, we have examined changes in prescription and literature to better understand the use of algorithm. The committee has updated the QAAPAPLE algorithm to guide clinicians in using LAAP along the path of patients with psychosis as early as the first episode and through different clinical settings (including treatment resistance) in order to have a more flexible and user-friendly treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.