SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of complete rings (MyoRing) in treatment of Keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International ophthalmology · 2019Pooled it
- Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes after implantation of a combination of intrastromal corneal ring segments in different optical zones in advanced keratoconus.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- "Eye-Conic" Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals the Layer-Specific Molecular Alterations in Corneas of Patients With Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Vision-Related Quality of Life in Iraqi Keratoconus Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Next-generation smart ophthalmic biomaterials: From passive response to active interaction and closed-loop control.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Keratoconus Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Keratoconus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Article
- Intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus patients: up to 12 years follow up.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Review
- Online survey about keratoconus management by optometrists.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Acute Anterior Uveitis with HLA-B27 Positivity after Corneal Cross-Linking with Previous Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a new nomogram for Ferrara ring segment implantation in keratoconus.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Advances in IOL calculations in patients with keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKeratoconus is a degenerative condition of the cornea that profoundly affects vision and vision-specific quality of life. The axial cornea thins and protrudes, resulting in irregularity and, eventually, scarring of the cornea. There are multiple options available for treating keratoconus. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are small, crescent-shaped plastic rings that are placed in the deep, peripheral corneal stroma in order to flatten the cornea. They are made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The procedure does not involve corneal tissue nor does it invade the central optical zone. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are approved for use when contact lenses or spectacles are no longer adequate.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrastromal corneal ring segments as a treatment for keratoconus. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not implement any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors independently assessed records from the electronic searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Disagreements were resolved by discussion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned for two authors to independently review full-text reports, using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN
resultsWe found no RCTs comparing intrastromal corneal ring segments with spectacles or contact lenses. AUTHORS'
conclusionsIn the absence of eligible RCTs to review, no conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.