Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087649›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019

Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus.

Karla Zadnik, Sarah Money, Kristina Lindsley

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Keratoconus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karla ZadnikCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, USA, OH 43210.
Sarah Money
Kristina Lindsley
Johns Hopkins University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness Research & the Cochrane Eyes & Vision GroupU01EY020522 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSIN, KAY · 2010 to 2016
$9.2M
Department of HealthNEI NIH HHS U01 EY020522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeratoconus is a degenerative condition of the cornea that profoundly affects vision and vision-specific quality of life. The axial cornea thins and protrudes, resulting in irregularity and, eventually, scarring of the cornea. There are multiple options available for treating keratoconus. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are small, crescent-shaped plastic rings that are placed in the deep, peripheral corneal stroma in order to flatten the cornea. They are made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The procedure does not involve corneal tissue nor does it invade the central optical zone. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are approved for use when contact lenses or spectacles are no longer adequate.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrastromal corneal ring segments as a treatment for keratoconus. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not implement any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors independently assessed records from the electronic searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Disagreements were resolved by discussion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned for two authors to independently review full-text reports, using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN

resultsWe found no RCTs comparing intrastromal corneal ring segments with spectacles or contact lenses. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn the absence of eligible RCTs to review, no conclusions can be drawn.

Indexed as

Corneal StromaCorneal TransplantationHumansKeratoconusProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis Implantation

Identifiers

PMID31087649
PMCPMC6516208
OpenAlexW1801618215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.