Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087277›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2019

Morphological and dynamic evaluation of complex cystic focal liver lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: current state of the art.

Antonio Corvino, Fabio Sandomenico, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Fabio Corvino, Domenico Tafuri, Orlando Catalano

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. CT and MR imaging of cystic renal lesions.Insights into imaging · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio CorvinoMotor Science and Wellness Department, University of Naples "Parthenope", VIA F. Acton 38, 80133, Naples, Italy. an.cor@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6608-6252
Fabio SandomenicoRadiology Department, National Cancer Institute Pascale Foundation, Via M. Semmola 53, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Sergio Venanzio SetolaRadiology Department, National Cancer Institute Pascale Foundation, Via M. Semmola 53, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Fabio CorvinoVascular and Interventional Radiology Department, Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Domenico TafuriMotor Science and Wellness Department, University of Naples "Parthenope", VIA F. Acton 38, 80133, Naples, Italy.
Orlando CatalanoRadiology Unit, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, Via Cornelia Dei Gracchi 65, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITParthenope University of Naples · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex cystic and cystic-like focal liver lesions (FLLs) encompass a spectrum of disorders ranging from non-neoplastic conditions to benign and malignant tumors. In this prospective, the possibility of non-invasive differentiation of these lesions is extremely important, because the clinical implications and therapeutic strategies vary considerably. Because of its advantageous cost/benefit ratio, widespread availability and easy execution, ultrasound (US) is the first-line imaging modality in most countries for the initial liver survey and represents the imaging technique that usually detects a complex liver cyst. However, US showed poor efficacy in the differential diagnosis of complex cystic FLLs. Thus, for years, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have been used for further assessment of these lesions. Recently, the development of low mechanical index real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) technique performed with the second generation of US contrast agents has led to an accurate depiction of macrovasculature and microvasculature. The technique yields information about contrast enhancement of the liver and FLLs almost as CT and MRI do, but in real time and without the use of ionizing radiation. To date, there is only a small amount of evidence about the role of CEUS in the less common setting of complex liver cysts. The aim of this review is to offer an up-to-date overview on the state of the art of CEUS in the study of the most common complex cystic focal liver lesions. To our knowledge, there are no literature comprehensive reviews on this topic.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaCystsHumansLiver DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsUltrasonographyContrast MediaComplex cystic liver lesionsContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)Cystic liver lesionsUltrasound contrast agentUltrasound microbubbles

Identifiers

PMID31087277
PMCPMC6704192
OpenAlexW2946826432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.