Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087271›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019

Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Kayleen E Schreiber, Bob McMurray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decoupling speech processing from time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. The development of lexical competition in written- and spoken-word recognition.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kayleen E SchreiberInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Bob McMurrayDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa, W311 SSH, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. bob-mcmurray@uiowa.edu.

Funding

The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007421 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Sheila A Baker, Daniel T. Tranel · 1999 to 2026
$6.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech unfolds rapidly over time, and the information necessary to recognize even a single phoneme may not be available simultaneously. Consequently, listeners must both integrate prior acoustic cues and anticipate future segments. Prior work on stop consonants and vowels suggests that listeners integrate asynchronous cues by partially activating lexical entries as soon as any information is available, and then updating this when later cues arrive. However, a recent study suggests that for the voiceless sibilant fricatives (/s/ and /ʃ/), listeners wait to initiate lexical access until all cues have arrived at the onset of the vowel. Sibilants also contain coarticulatory cues that could be used to anticipate the vowel upcoming. However, given these results, it is unclear if listeners could use them fast enough to speed vowel recognition. The current study examines anticipation by asking when listeners use coarticulatory information in the frication to predict the upcoming vowel. A visual world paradigm experiment found that listeners do not wait: they anticipate the vowel immediately from the onset of the frication, even as they wait several hundred milliseconds to identify the fricative. This finding suggests listeners do not strictly process phonemes in the order that they appear; rather the dynamics of language processing may be largely internal and only loosely coupled to the dynamics of the input.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalCuesAcoustic StimulationHumansLanguageMalePhoneticsSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionTime FactorsAnticipationCoarticulationCue integrationm Auditory memorySpeech perceptionSpoken word recognition

Identifiers

PMID31087271
PMCPMC6688751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.