Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087166›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Is pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation caused by a chronic infection?

Søren Ohrt-Nissen, Blaine Fritz, Lars Valentin, Kasper Nørskov Kragh, Claus Manniche, Benny Dahl, Thomas Bjarnsholt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unexpected positive culture (UPC) in adults revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors, and management.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Søren Ohrt-NissenSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. ohrtnissen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-9948
Blaine FritzDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars ValentinSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper Nørskov KraghDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus MannicheClinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Benny DahlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas BjarnsholtDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisTo assess whether a chronic bacterial infection is present in a subset of patients with pseudarthrosis after instrumented spinal fusion.

methodsThis was a prospective diagnostic study including adult patients with previous instrumented spinal fusion. Patients underwent revision surgery for either pseudarthrosis or other causes (e.g. implant removal, curve progression or junctional kyphosis) (control group). Five separate biopsies were randomly collected, intraoperatively, from the pseudarthrosis site and cultivated under both aerobic (5 days) and anaerobic (14 days) conditions. If cultivation was positive in at least 2/5 tissue samples, the biopsy was sectioned and stained using peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH). Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to examine the sections and visualize bacterial aggregates.

resultsThe study included 32 pseudarthrosis and 32 control patients. Cultivation yielded bacteria in at least 1/5 biopsies in 52% of patients with no difference between the groups (p = 1.0). Bacteria of the same species was found in at least 2/5 samples in seven pseudarthrosis patients and four controls (p = 0.509). Propionibacterium acnes was found in 8 of these 11 samples. Microscopy demonstrated tissue-embedded bacterial aggregates in two of these patients but with no inflammatory cells indicating an active infection. The presence of bacteria was not associated with the number of previous spinal procedures or the pre-revision fusion length (p ≥ 0.503).

conclusionsPseudarthrosis after instrumented spinal surgery was not significantly associated with the presence of bacteria at the pseudarthrosis site. Positive cultivation results are common after spinal instrumentation, but our results indicate that they rarely represent an organized infection. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseasePostoperative ComplicationsPseudarthrosisHumansProspective StudiesReoperationSpinal FusionSpineAdult spinal deformityInfectionNon-unionPseudarthrosisSpinal instrumentation

Identifiers

PMID31087166
OpenAlexW2946186754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.