Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087159›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019

[Diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis in patients over 65 years old : Current status and future perspectives].

Peter Dovjak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter DovjakAkutgeriatrie, Salzkammergutklinikum Gmunden, Miller-von-Aichholzstr. 49, 4810, Gmunden, Österreich. peter.dovjak@gespag.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-8805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only one third of all women with osteoporosis over the age of 65 years are adequately treated; therefore, many experience fractures. For men the data are insufficient. Using a newly developed algorithm and based on the current guidelines, the diagnosis and specific treatment of osteoporosis can be easily set up. The differential treatment should be selected in an individualized approach based on the side effect profile of the specific medication. No statistically significant differences were found between most specific osteoporotic drugs in head-to-head comparisons. This article presents an overview of the currently available pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical forms of treatment as well as approaches with novel medications and interventions for a better control of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHumansMaleOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesBone Density Conservation AgentsAlgorithmsBone densityDisease managementFractures, boneGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID31087159
OpenAlexW2946765576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.