ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019
[Juvenile dermatomyositis-what's new?]
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards New Strategies: Case Report and Review of the Literature-Effective Use of JAK Inhibitor Baricitinib in a 4-Year-Old Boy with Anti-MDA5 Antibody-Positive Juvenile Dermatomyositis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Undercover lung damage in pediatrics - a hot spot in morbidity caused by collagenoses.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common chronic inflammatory myopathy of childhood, which is still frequently characterized by a complicated disease course. In this review, novel findings relating to JDM are presented based on a review of the literature. Myositis-specific antibodies are often detected and may correlate with clinical phenotypes and disease course. Activation of type I interferon pathways plays an important pathogenic role and relates to the main clinical manifestations of the disease. This may lead to targeted therapies in the future. Currently, there are no treatments specifically approved for the treatment of JDM. Standard therapy is currently considered to include glucocorticoids and methotrexate based on a randomized controlled study and expert consensus. Several medications are commonly used in cases of refractory JDM, including azathioprine, ciclosporin, intravenous immune globulins, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab. An optimal treatment of JDM has not yet been established; however, there are national and international consensus recommendations and treatment plans that may aid in the decision-making process. Several validated tools are available to assess disease activity, disease damage, and treatment responses. Such tools should be routinely used in patients with JDM, and ideally be documented in registries in order to allow comparative effectiveness studies. The PRO-KIND initiative of the German Society for Pediatric Rheumatology has developed a diagnostic and a treat-to-target strategy based on a practice- and consensus-based process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.