Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31087001›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology letters2019

Multiplex genome editing of microorganisms using CRISPR-Cas.

Belén Adiego-Pérez, Paola Randazzo, Jean Marc Daran, René Verwaal, Johannes A Roubos, Pascale Daran-Lapujade, John van der Oost

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Paenibacillus polymyxa.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Base editing enables duplex point mutagenesis inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Belén Adiego-PérezLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Paola RandazzoDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands.
Jean Marc DaranDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands.
René VerwaalDSM Biotechnology Center, Alexander Fleminglaan 1, 2613 AX Delft, The Netherlands.
Johannes A RoubosDSM Biotechnology Center, Alexander Fleminglaan 1, 2613 AX Delft, The Netherlands.
Pascale Daran-LapujadeDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands.
John van der OostLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology · NLDSM (Netherlands) · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial production of chemical compounds often requires highly engineered microbial cell factories. During the last years, CRISPR-Cas nucleases have been repurposed as powerful tools for genome editing. Here, we briefly review the most frequently used CRISPR-Cas tools and describe some of their applications. We describe the progress made with respect to CRISPR-based multiplex genome editing of industrial bacteria and eukaryotic microorganisms. We also review the state of the art in terms of gene expression regulation using CRISPRi and CRISPRa. Finally, we summarize the pillars for efficient multiplexed genome editing and present our view on future developments and applications of CRISPR-Cas tools for multiplex genome editing.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacteriaGene EditingIndustrial MicrobiologyCas12aCas9cell factoriesCRISPR-Casgenome editingmultiplex

Identifiers

PMID31087001
PMCPMC6522427
OpenAlexW2946567891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.