ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2018
Extracting Complementary Insights from Molecular Phenotypes for Prioritization of Disease-Associated Mutations.
Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An interpretable molecular framework for predicting cancer driver missense mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Advancing precision nutrition: bridging mechanistic insight and clinical implementation.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Time-course characterization of whole-transcriptome dynamics of HepG2/C3A spheroids and its toxicological implications.Toxicology letters · 2024Article
- Leveraging the transcriptome to further our understanding of GWAS findings: eQTLs associated with genes related to LDL and LDL subclasses, in a cohort of African Americans.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Unfolding the genotype-to-phenotype black box of cardiovascular diseases through cross-scale modeling.iScience · 2022Article
- In Silico Structural and Biochemical Functional Analysis of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advances in next-generation sequencing technology have resulted in an explosion of whole-exome/genome sequencing data, providing an unprecedented opportunity to identify disease- and trait-associated variants in humans on a large scale. To date, the long-standing paradigm has leveraged fitness-based approximations to translate this ever-expanding sequencing data into causal insights in disease. However, while this approach robustly identifies variants under evolutionary constraint, it fails to provide molecular insights. Moreover, complex disease phenomena often violate standard assumptions of a direct organismal phenotype to overall fitness effect relationship. Here we discuss the potential of a molecular phenotype-oriented paradigm to uniquely identify candidate disease-causing mutations from the human genetic background. By providing a direct connection between single nucleotide mutations and observable organismal and cellular phenotypes associated with disease, we suggest that molecular phenotypes can readily incorporate alongside established fitness-based methodologies to provide complementary insights to the functional impact of human mutations. Lastly, we discuss how integrated approaches between molecular phenotypes and fitness-based perspectives facilitate new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying disease-associated mutations while also providing a platform for improved interpretation of epistasis in human disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.