ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2019
Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers.
Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The challenges and opportunities clinical education in the context of psychological, educational and therapeutic dimensions in teaching hospital.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancing the critical thinking skills, and knowledge acquisition of nursing students using problem-based learning: A quasi-experimental study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Live Streaming of the Professor's Ward Rounds in Undergraduate Neurology Education: Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- The effect of "clinical virtual round" on clinical self-efficacy among midwifery students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- The ward round: friend or foe in postgraduate training? A grounded theory study of residents' perspectives.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Clinical teachers' professional identity formation: an exploratory study using the 4S transition framework.International journal of medical education · 2022Article
- OB-Newborn TEACH Cards: A Curricular Tool for Maternal-Child Rotations That Influences Patient Care.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2022Article
- Using instant messaging applications to promote clinical teaching of medical students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Challenges and strategies of clinical rounds from the perspective of medical students: A qualitative research.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Outpatient Exam Room Presentations in Resident Continuity Clinics: a Qualitative Report.Medical science educator · 2020Article
- Sustained effects of faculty leadership development modules for clinical instructors of core competences education in Taiwan: a four-year explanatory case study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- An Observation of a Resident-as-Teacher Combined with Tutor Guided Hysteroscopy Teaching Program for Standardized Residency Training (SRT) in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Implementation of a Clinical Leadership Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Assessment of Clinical Leadership Training Needs in Senior Pediatric Residents.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding of medical teachers' perceptions concerning the challenges of clinical rounds can help identify the key areas of focus to better foster professional development of medical students. This study explored the opinions of medical teachers of Kerman University of Medical Sciences about the challenges embedded in clinical rounds. There is a paucity of studies regarding the topic under investigation in our context.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis method. We held a focus group discussion with eight skilled bedside teachers, chosen using purposive sampling, from Kerman University of Medical Sciences in February 2018. The focus group lasted for approximately 2 hours. The session was audio-taped. We analyzed data by considering the verbatim transcribed document of the audio-recorded discussions using conventional content analysis method for theme development. Informed consent was obtained from the participants.
resultsMedical teachers described many primary challenges to clinical rounds. Some of them were multiple students on rounding practices, time constraints, priority of research and patient care to teaching, and lack of participation and enthusiasm. We categorized these varied challenges into 5 specific areas related to (1) system; (2) teachers; (3) learners; (4) patients; and (5) evaluation issues. Focus group participants expressed some suggestions to mitigate barriers such as having fewer students on the rounds, addressing time constraints through planning and flexibility, and the provision of medical education award.
conclusionClinical round practices are valuable but replete with a spectrum of problems. Many challenges affect the quality of teaching in clinical rounds that should be taken into account by bedside teachers in order to improve the quality of rounding practices. The identified challenges can be used in redressing bedside teaching to have more efficient rounding practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31086798PMC6475027W2937612412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.