Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086798›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2019

Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers.

Amin Beigzadeh, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy, Peyman Adibi, Nikoo Yamani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implementation of a Clinical Leadership Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  15. Assessment of Clinical Leadership Training Needs in Senior Pediatric Residents.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amin BeigzadehDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Kambiz BahaadinbeigyMedical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Peyman AdibiIntegrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nikoo YamaniDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding of medical teachers' perceptions concerning the challenges of clinical rounds can help identify the key areas of focus to better foster professional development of medical students. This study explored the opinions of medical teachers of Kerman University of Medical Sciences about the challenges embedded in clinical rounds. There is a paucity of studies regarding the topic under investigation in our context.

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis method. We held a focus group discussion with eight skilled bedside teachers, chosen using purposive sampling, from Kerman University of Medical Sciences in February 2018. The focus group lasted for approximately 2 hours. The session was audio-taped. We analyzed data by considering the verbatim transcribed document of the audio-recorded discussions using conventional content analysis method for theme development. Informed consent was obtained from the participants.

resultsMedical teachers described many primary challenges to clinical rounds. Some of them were multiple students on rounding practices, time constraints, priority of research and patient care to teaching, and lack of participation and enthusiasm. We categorized these varied challenges into 5 specific areas related to (1) system; (2) teachers; (3) learners; (4) patients; and (5) evaluation issues. Focus group participants expressed some suggestions to mitigate barriers such as having fewer students on the rounds, addressing time constraints through planning and flexibility, and the provision of medical education award.

conclusionClinical round practices are valuable but replete with a spectrum of problems. Many challenges affect the quality of teaching in clinical rounds that should be taken into account by bedside teachers in order to improve the quality of rounding practices. The identified challenges can be used in redressing bedside teaching to have more efficient rounding practices.

Indexed as

ClinicalFocus groupMedical teachers

Identifiers

PMID31086798
PMCPMC6475027
OpenAlexW2937612412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.