Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086730›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Management factors affecting physical health and welfare of tourist camp elephants in Thailand.

Pakkanut Bansiddhi, Korakot Nganvongpanit, Janine L Brown, Veerasak Punyapornwithaya, Pornsawan Pongsopawijit, Chatchote Thitaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Behavioral Coding of Captive African Elephants (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Welfare Assessment and Activities of Captive Elephants in Thailand.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Non-Invasive Assessment of Physiological Stress in Captive Asian Elephants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pakkanut BansiddhiCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Korakot NganvongpanitCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7617-5507
Janine L BrownCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3898-7755
Veerasak PunyapornwithayaDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pornsawan PongsopawijitCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chatchote ThitaramCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-5596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation in management across elephant camps likely has differential effects on the well-being of elephants.

methodsThis study calculated body condition, foot health and skin wound scores (WSs) for 122 elephants from 15 elephant camps in Chiang Mai province, and examined relationships to management factors using a multi-variable modeling approach.

resultsThe majority of elephants had high body condition scores (BCS) indicative of being overweight or obese, mild foot problems, but few visible wounds. Females had higher BCSs than males, as did elephants provided a water source at night. Increasing age was associated with higher foot and WSs. Higher WSs were observed in about a quarter of the cases where mahouts carried a hook. Wounds related to saddle riding were rare. Elephants that rested on sand floors at night had a decreased risk of high WSs compared to elephants that rested on compact dirt floors. DISCUSSION: Findings emphasize the need for elephant camps to adjust management activities that negatively affect body condition (e.g., feeding too many sweet treats), foot health (e.g., hard substrates) and wounding (e.g., misuse of equipment) to improve health and welfare of this population.

Indexed as

Asian elephantElephant campHealthManagementThailandWelfare

Identifiers

PMID31086730
PMCPMC6487189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.