Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086706›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2019

Changes in fundus reflectivity during myopia development in chickens.

Barbara Swiatczak, Marita Feldkaemper, Frank Schaeffel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Retinal Changes From Hyperopia to Myopia: Not All Diopters Are Created Equal.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  4. Retinal glia in myopia: current understanding and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of air pollution on myopia: an update on clinical evidence and biological mechanisms.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. IMI 2021 Yearly Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara SwiatczakSection of Neurobiology of the Eye, Ophthalmic Research Institute, University of Tuebingen, Elfriede Aulhorn Str. 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Marita FeldkaemperSection of Neurobiology of the Eye, Ophthalmic Research Institute, University of Tuebingen, Elfriede Aulhorn Str. 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Frank SchaeffelSection of Neurobiology of the Eye, Ophthalmic Research Institute, University of Tuebingen, Elfriede Aulhorn Str. 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
STZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that changes in functional activity in the retina can be visualized as changes in fundus reflectivity. When the image projected on the retina is low pass filtered or defocused by covering the eye with a frosted diffuser or a negative lens, it starts growing longer and develops myopia. We have tested the hypothesis that the resulting altered retinal activity may show up as changes in fundus reflectivity. Fundus reflectivity was measured in chickens

Identifiers

PMID31086706
PMCPMC6485001
OpenAlexW2921272648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.