ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Nonlinear Brillouin spectroscopy: what makes it a better tool for biological viscoelastic measurements.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Mapping of Fibrotic Tissue Mechanics via Brillouin Spectroscopy.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Cellular mechanical properties in response to environmental viscosity imaged by Brillouin Microscopy.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Porcine vocal fold elasticity evaluation using Brillouin spectroscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Uncertainty Estimation for the Brillouin Frequency Shift Measurement Using a Scanning Tandem Fabry-Pérot Interferometer.Micromachines · 2023Article
- A high-precision multi-dimensional microspectroscopic technique for morphological and properties analysis of cancer cell.Light, science & applications · 2023Article
- Spectral resolution enhancement for impulsive stimulated Brillouin spectroscopy by expanding pump beam geometry.Optics express · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Mapping mechanical properties of biological materials via an add-on Brillouin module to confocal microscopes.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- Excitation of Faraday-like body waves in vibrated living earthworms.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mechanical Characterization for Cellular Mechanobiology: Current Trends and Future Prospects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Brillouin Light Scattering Microspectroscopy for Biomedical Research and Applications: introduction to feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- High-Dose Photodynamic Therapy Increases Tau Protein Signals in Drosophila.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics : a publication of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brillouin spectroscopy is an emerging tool in biomedical imaging and sensing. It is capable of assessing the high-frequency viscoelastic longitudinal modulus with microscopic spatial resolution. Nonlinear Brillouin spectroscopy based on impulsive stimulated Brillouin scattering offers a number of significant advantages over conventional spontaneous and stimulated Brillouin scattering. In this report, we evaluate the accuracy of Brillouin shift measurements in spontaneous and nonlinear Brillouin microscopy by calculating the Allan variance for both CW excited spontaneous Brillouin measurements and nonlinear Brillouin scattering measurements made with both nanosecond and picosecond pulse excitation. We find that impulsive stimulated Brillouin spectroscopy is superior to spontaneous Brillouin spectroscopy in terms of the accuracy of such measurements and demonstrate its application for assessing tiny changes in Brillouin frequency shifts associated with low concentrations of biologically relevant solutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.