Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086687›Full record

ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

Lisa Parks, Meghan Routt, Allison De Villiers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa ParksThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Meghan RouttUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Allison De VilliersThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing major surgical procedures. Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies were reviewed. Each item of the perioperative treatment pathway in the English language was examined and reviewed. Enhanced recovery after surgery items that were the strongest predictors for a shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity were absence of a nasogastric tube, early mobilization, early oral nutrition, early removal of the epidural, early removal of the urinary catheter, and utilization of nonopioid analgesia. Based on evidence available for each element of the perioperative care pathway, ERAS provides a protocol for perioperative care. This protocol allows for further evidence-based studies that are adequately powered between institutions.

Identifiers

PMID31086687
PMCPMC6505539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.