Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086592›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019

Efficacy and safety of intrathecal meropenem and vancomycin in the treatment of postoperative intracranial infection in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Qiang Zhang, Hongxing Chen, Chao Zhu, Fangzhou Chen, Suohui Sun, Nan Liang, Wei Zheng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intrathecal Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiang ZhangEmergency Department, Tai'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Hongxing ChenDepartment of ICU, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Chao ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Fangzhou ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Suohui SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Nan LiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Wei ZhengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China.
Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University · CNShanxi Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the improvement and safety of intrathecal meropenem and vancomycin in the treatment of postoperative intracranial infection in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). A retrospective analysis was performed on 86 patients with intracranial infections after cranial trauma operation in Tai'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University from May 2004 to June 2017. The patients were divided into the control group (43 patients) and the experimental group (43 patients) according to the treatment. Patients in the control group were intravenously infused with vancomycin hydrochloride (1.0 g, Q12H) and meropenem (2.0 g, Q8H). After lumbar cistern drainage was performed for the release of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), patients in the experimental group were slowly given vancomycin 20 mg. After the tube was flushed with 2 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride injection, the patients were slowly given meropenem 20 mg, bid. The clinical efficacy, cure time and treatment cost of patients in the two groups were observed. The adverse reactions and sequelae after 6 months of treatment were recorded. The response rate (RR) of patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The cure time of patients in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The treatment cost of patients in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of patients, incidence of sequelae of patients in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Intrathecal meropenem and vancomycin is more effective than intravenous administration in the treatment of intracranial infection after craniotomy. It can significantly shorten the treatment time and reduce the treatment cost, with better safety.

Indexed as

efficacyintrathecal injectionmeropenemsafetysevere traumatic brain injuryvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID31086592
PMCPMC6489086
OpenAlexW2940386622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.