ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Comparison of efficacy between trimetazidine and cilostazol in the treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans in lower extremity.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trimetazidine in Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Review
- New insight of the efficacy trimetazidine in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical revascularization for patients with lower extremity artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Humanistic care interventions in patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy and long-term survival rate of trimetazidine and cilostazol in the treatment of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO). A retrospectively analysis on the medical records of 206 patients with ASO who were admitted to The Central Hospital of Wuhan from January 2011 to May 2013 was performed, including 94 patients treated with trimetazidine (group A) and 112 patients treated with cilostazol (group B). On the basis of the same basic treatment, both groups were applied with these two drugs after two courses of treatments. Then the efficacy of clinical treatment, dorsal artery blood flow, anterior femoral artery, posterior tibial artery blood flow, brachial artery index, toe-brachial index, painless walking distance, maximum walking distance, adverse reactions, 5-year survival rates were compared. The total effective rate of clinical efficacy in group B was higher than group A (P<0.05). After the first course of treatment, the above indicators increased in both groups (P<0.05). After the end of the second course of treatment, the above-mentioned index values in both groups were significantly increased (P<0.05). The improvement of the above indicators in group B were better than the trimetazidine group in both the first and second treatment courses (P<0.05). In group A, there were 15 cases of patients with lethargy and hypodynamia and 9 cases of dizziness and headache. There were significant differences between the 7th and 3rd cases of patients when compared to group B (P<0.05). The 5-year survival rate of group A was lower than group B (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy of cliostazol in the treatment of ASO had a good effect, and there was only a few adverse reactions and the long-term survival rate was high. It is worthy of being promoted in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.