ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Design and application of subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel radiographic analysis system for subaxial cervical spine pedicle screw placement.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- The Attallah screw: Where safety meets robustness in posterior subaxial cervical instrumentation.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, a novel subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device was designed and developed. In cervical specimens (C3-C7), a pedicle screw was inserted into the left pedicle using the guide device with a keyhole partial laminectomy and tapping technique, and the right pedicle by drilling using the Abumi technique. After removing the pedicle screws, the channel wall of each pedicle screw was probed with a pedicle probe. The vertebral body was then dissociated for direct observation of the screw channel. Among the 10 specimens, 2 of the 50 pedicles (4%) in the guide device group were perforated. Screw placement failed in 8 of 50 pedicles (16%) in the Abumi technique group. Significant differences were observed in the outcomes for the guide device and Abumi technique groups. The subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device developed in the present study decreased the failure rate of pedicle screw placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.