Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086550›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Mixed method survey to assess the problems and propose solutions for implementation of CME/CPD in Sindh, Pakistan.

Nighat Shah, Marium Soomro, Mehjabeen Musharraf, Shiraz Shaikh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nighat ShahNighat Shah, MBBS, MCPS, FCPS, MRCOG, MHPE, APPNA Institute of Public Health, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marium SoomroMarium Soomro, BDS, MSPH, APPNA Institute of Public Health, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mehjabeen MusharrafMehjabeen Musharraf, MSC, MSPH, APPNA Institute of Public Health, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shiraz ShaikhShiraz Sheikh, MBBS, FCPS, APPNA Institute of Public Health, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jinnah Sindh Medical University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the type of CME/CPD sessions attended by doctors, identify the problems with implementation of CME/CPD program and propose possible solutions for successful implementation of CME/CPD Program.

methodsThis was a concurrent triangulation mixed method study. Quantitative questionnaires were filled by faculty and physicians from different specialties. The qualitative component had both focus groups and in depth interviews conducted with different professional bodies (PMA), faculty JSMU, College of Family Physicians. This study was done in 2016-2017.

resultsMore than half of the participants (53.6%) reported that CPD/CME should be mandatory. Doctors who had graduated from outside Karachi were significantly less likely to report CPD/CME to be mandatory as compared to graduates from Karachi (p=0.004).Top three factors which influenced HCP's to attend CPD/CME included career progression (65.1%), interest (54.7%) and knowledge gap (50.5%). The most common perceived barriers were lack of study leave, cost and work-life imbalance. The implementation issues expressed by different stakeholders included lack of doctor's interest, busy clinical schedule and poor accessibility.

conclusionMostly medical practioners believe that CPD program is an important step toward enabling physicians to demonstrate their competency and professionalism to themselves and others. The PM&DC has to take practical steps to evaluate the cognitive, clinical, and humanistic attributes of certified doctors.

Indexed as

AccreditationCME/CPDRecredentialling

Identifiers

PMID31086550
PMCPMC6500816
OpenAlexW2920999292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.